Psychodynamic Perspective (10-Oct-2002)

Psychodynamic == mental processes in conflict or change

References

Books

  1. Psychology: A New Introduction for A Level (2nd edition), Gross et al
  2. Freud: A Very Short Introduction, Anthony Storr

Web links

  1. George Boeree's Page on Freud

Back to index page


Homework

Write a chart contrasting strengths and weaknesses of the psychodynamic approach.

With specific reference to Freud's theories, and without considering subsequent developments in the field of psychoanalysis:

"If you look at everything critically, there isn't much in psychoanalysis that will stand up. Yet it helped me. He was a genius."

The "Wolf Man"

Strengths

Weaknesses

Patients undergoing therapy with Freudian practitioners show improvements, and keep coming back for more

It may not be the psychoanalyis per se that is helping, so much as the opportunity to talk freely with an uncritical listener (ref: George Kelly, see http://www.ship.edu/~cgboeree/kelly.html).

The idea of an unconscious/conscious split is a very useful metaphor for explaining various aspects of human behaviour

There is arguably more detail in Freud’s model of the mind than is justified on the evidence, and this leads to a danger that it will be taken too literally

Acknowledges sex as a major influence on behaviour

The focus on sex as the most important motivating force is arguably a product of the society and culture Freud was working in.

Classifications of personality types, e.g. "anal-retentive" accurately describe sets of characteristics commonly found together.

There is little evidence for Freud's assertion that these personality types develop as a result of result of the childhood experiences that he suggests;

e.g. strict toilet-training, doesn't in practise seem to be associated with the "anal-retentive" personality

 

Freud puts forward theories based on generalising the experience he had when treating a set of patients who were not at all representative of the population as a whole (i.e. they mostly were adult Europeans in the late 19th Century, who were suffering from some form of emotional disturbance)

Identifies childhood experiences as being important in influencing adult problems; experience and research seems to back this up.

Theories of childhood development are outrageously conjectural, and have little or no experimental foundation; e.g. there is little evidence that, e.g. "anal-retentive" personalities develop as a consequence of strict toilet-training

Has provided us with some cracking ideas, e.g. repression, rationalisation, denial, projection, "Freudian slips".

Because so many of Freud's idioms have become part of our culture, it makes it harder for us to think of them objectively; e.g. films such as "Psycho" and "The Silence of the Lambs" lend what may be a spurious credibility to these theories.

Legitimised research into dreams

Interpretation of dreams as suggested by Freud seems to be more about the interpreter's pre-conceptions than any empirical/experimental evidence